Alcohol linked to better survival after heart attack

http://health.usnews.com/top-doctors/directory/best-cardiologists

Reuters reports findings published in the American Journal of Cardiology which found that women who drank higher levels of alcohol in the year leading up to a heart attack ended up living longer than women who never drank.

Research conducted on approximately 1,200 women adds to mounting evidence that alcohol, regardless of the type of drink, can be good for the heart.

Joshua Rosenbloom, a Harvard Medical School student who led the study commented, “One thing that was interesting was that we didn’t see differences among different beverage types.

“The most recent evidence suggests that it’s the alcohol itself that’s beneficial,” he said, adding that whether the women drank beer, wine, or hard liquor, there was a similarly reduced risk of dying within the follow up period.


“One drink a day is a really good target, assuming that a person can be disciplined about that,” said cardiologist James O’Keefe of St. Luke’s Health System in Kansas City, Missouri, who was not involved in the study.

Researchers surveying women hospitalized for a heart attack asked questions about how many alcoholic drinks the women usually consumed, along with other health and lifestyle questions.

Ten years or more after their heart attacks, the team found that 44% of women who had abstained from alcohol had died, while 25% of “light drinkers” and 18% of “heavy drinkers” had died. Net-net, women who drank had roughly a 35% lower chance of dying during the follow up period than those who didn’t.

In a prior study which included both men and women, Dr. O’Keefe also found people who continued to drink moderately after having a heart attack had better health than those who abstained.

“You don’t need to assume that people need to stop drinking once they develop heart disease,” he said. “The problem is that alcohol is a slippery slope, and while we know that a little bit is good for us, a lot of it is really bad.”

Jury Declares Cardiologist Not Criminally Responsible For Children’s Deaths

Jurors in a St-Jerome, Quebec courtroom decided Dr. Guy Turcotte, a cardiologist from the Montreal area, was not criminally responsible due to his mental state when he killed this two children, reports Canada’s NationalPost.

The 11-member jury’s decision on July 5 came after five days of deliberations, and was the least punitive of four possible verdicts: “not criminally responsible because of a mental disorder” for the murder Turcotte, 39, confessed to committing.

The doctor’s defense attorneys, brothers Pierre and Guy Poupart, effectively convinced jurors that their client was suffering from sudden, upsetting changes in his life when he stabbed his daughter, Anne-Sophie (3), 19 times, and son, Olivier (5), 27 times.


The children’s mother, Isabelle Gaston, said, “I’m in shock. I didn’t expect this at all. … I’m disappointed for Anne-Sophie and Olivier and for all children that could be in danger.” Gaston, who does not intend to pursue an appeal, added, “Even if it had been first-degree murder, I wouldn’t have been satisfied because I’ll never get my children back.”

Turcotte will be remain behind bars, where he has been since his arrest after the killings, until a special psychiatric panel meets with him and determines whether he should spend time at the Philippe Pinel Institute or be released.

When the verdict was read by Superior Court Justice Marc David, approximately half of the spectators in the courtroom let out a sigh of relief and half sat in stunned shock. Justice David assured the jurors they could be proud of their work, regardless of the public reaction.. “There isn’t another group of 11 people, 11 lawyers, 11 jury members, 11 journalists or 11 members of the public who attended this trial every day. This intimate knowledge of the evidence gave you the ability to render justice.”

Read more at NationalPost.com or CTVNews.